Penetration testing · Security audits · Risk assessment
You built it to work.We test where it breaks.
We test connected applications, APIs, cloud integrations, native software and AI agents. Every engagement ends in reproducible findings, demonstrated impact and a report your team can act on — for remediation, risk review and customer assurance.
Written scopeHuman-led testingReplies within 24 hours
Build the recordPriority + remediationTrack record + credentials
Trusted for work that has to stand up to review.
Our testers earned their record in public — through bounties and recognition on the major coordinated-disclosure platforms — and WebCook Labs works alongside certification, audit and compliance partners when testing supports a wider assurance program.
Bug bounty track record
Coordinated disclosureCertification + assurance partners
Coordinated deliveryAssurance programs supported
Scope + evidence alignmentResearcher profiles and award records are publicly verifiable on each platform — ask during scoping. Certification-partner introductions are available on request.
WebCook testing platform · Private beta
Run the next test when the product changes.
A penetration test proves what was true the week it ran. The platform keeps testing after that: you authorize a scope once, and security-testing agents re-exercise it every time the product changes — a release, a new endpoint, a new integration — with a human supervisor in control throughout.
The platform supplements human-led assessments rather than replacing them. Agents act only inside the written scope, and people stay accountable for every finding.
- Authorize a scopeYou define the product, environment and boundaries in writing. Nothing runs outside them.
- Agents test inside itSecurity-testing agents probe the authorized scope the way an assessment would — repeatedly, not annually.
- A human reviews everythingA named supervisor sets objectives, evidence limits and stopping points, and reviews what the agents find.
- Repeat on every changeShip the release; the loop runs again. Findings arrive while the code is still fresh.
Detailed reporting
Clear findings. Practical fixes.
Each assessment gives your team the evidence to understand the risk, reproduce the issue, fix the right control and show what was tested.
Executive summary
What was tested, what we found and what it means for the business — readable without a security background.
Technical evidence
Reproduction steps, requests and captured output for each finding, so your engineers can confirm it themselves.
Prioritized remediation
Ordered by real exposure rather than raw severity, naming the control to change instead of the symptom to patch.
Scope and finding status
Exactly what was in and out of scope, and the state of every finding — open, fixed, or verified on retest.
Findings are written to survive review by someone who was not in the room. A redacted sample report is available during scoping.
Ways to engage
Start with the decision. We will shape the test.
Choose the engagement by the question you need answered. The scope can cross product layers when the evidence requires it.
Product penetration testing
Follow exploitable paths across applications, APIs, native clients and the backend services behind them.
- Identity and roles
- Business logic
- Data boundaries
External exposure assessment
Review public applications, infrastructure and third-party paths from an unauthenticated attacker’s position.
- Public assets
- Exposed services
- Validated paths
Security audit and connected-system review
Examine architecture, cloud and vendor trust, material changes, and AI or agent action boundaries.
- Launch readiness
- Integration trust
- AI + agent systems
Scope matrix
Surfaces are useful. Boundaries and consequences decide the test.
- Identity
- Roles
- Business logic
- Tenant boundaries
- Account abuse
- Data exposure
- Unauthorized transactions
- Service identity
- Secrets
- Events
- Vendor trust
- Cross-system reach
- Replay
- Privilege expansion
- Local storage
- IPC
- Deep links
- Update trust
- Credential exposure
- Control bypass
- Backend abuse
- Retrieval
- Memory
- Model instructions
- Tool permissions
- Cross-tenant leakage
- Unsafe action chains
- Unauthorized actions
- Asset inventory
- Exposed services
- Public workflows
- Initial access
- Forgotten assets
- Exploitable external paths
Research
Methods and field notes.
What an AI penetration test should cover in 2026
Scope the model, application, data, tools and ordinary attack surface as one system.
Field note · 7 minTesting AI across mobile and desktop clients
Native storage, IPC, update trust and the backend paths a browser review cannot reach.
Industry brief · 8 minAI security for retail, fashion and destination brands
How customer journeys and connected actions change the threat model.
Start with the reason
What decision does the test need to support?
A launch. A customer request. Procurement diligence. Audit preparation. A suspected weakness. A fix that needs verification. Tell us the decision and the system; we will shape the scope from there.
Prefer to talk it through first? [email protected] · +1 (425) 568-3048 — we respond to most inquiries within 24 hours.